pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @ch0k1 OP 3 May \ parent \ on: What kind of hard fork do you think Bitcoin needs more right now? bitcoin
Every fork just depreciates btc, doesnt it?
It's usually just the opposite because the network itself requires upgrading drastically from time to time depending on outside forces like Quantum commuting, AI, ML etc.
But if I were to do that, I think they should work on the security aspect.
Please register your vote as there's currently one entry and it's for privacy 😜
write
preview
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @Satosora 3 May
Would mine be considered privacy or security? Trying to minimize the governments interaction with my btc.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @ch0k1 OP 4 May
Depends on how you define "minimize" in your case because you either want/allow any government interaction of not - it can't be something in between...
If you want to completely block/ban government from interaction you need to implement it on a PoW level trying your best not to introduce a breaking changes (soft fork) but not postponing it if the situation requires the network to pay the price of agreeing to new consensus rules (a hard fork) which in my opinion classifies it as a security related instead of privacy
On the other hand, if you somehow think government somehow have to be involved in any sense (custody, audits, refunding lost funds, insurance etc) then we should basically allow a backdoor (what's btw the case with today's banking system) which then makes it more a privacy (identity and filtering) related
reply