Where's ~lightning?
31 sats \ 10 comments \ @C_Otto 11 May meta
This is/was the only channel I'm interested in. It's archived now. Why?
write
preview
related posts
0 sats \ 9 replies \ @k00b 11 May
It looks like the founder decided to not keep it going.
~lightning content is still viewable
reply
21 sats \ 8 replies \ @C_Otto OP 11 May
Can I take over?
reply
21 sats \ 7 replies \ @k00b 11 May freebie
Yep. You'd just put in lightning as the name here: https://stacker.news/territory
Note: these cost sats and do not return their investment yet.
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @AtlantisPleb 11 May
Yoink!
reply
100 sats \ 5 replies \ @C_Otto OP 11 May
Thanks, who needs sats anyway... fake money :)
reply
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @C_Otto OP 11 May
Oh, I didn't expect it to be a) that much b) recurring. I'm noping out.
reply
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 11 May
No worries. The price is a big hurdle. We have a non-recurring option, but that's more expensive.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @C_Otto OP 11 May
Yeah, I saw that. I don't run a business myself, but maybe it makes sense to make certain BTC related channels (like this one) free to attract more users?
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 11 May
Our plan is to let territories sell sub-territories, e.g. as the ~bitcoin founder, I will sell sub-territories for 10k/mo or any price I want. Someone can come along and buy ~bitcoin/mining or ~bitcoin/lightning for relatively low amounts. (Those sub-territories will also be able to sell sub-sub-territories and so on.)
So we'll have cheaper options when that arrives, and competition on pricing I hope, but for now these top-level ones are expensive.
view replies