Bitcoin could need a second Jack.
My 🔮🔮 prediction is that he is more interested in onchain Bitcoin and more into cold wallets and financials instead of tech and Lightning like Jack.
He also seems to be more political. Maybe he will be more on Fox News and can convince more so called conservatives 🐎🐎 who cling to Dollars for the illusion of patriotism.
Maybe he even can get active in Washington. Would love to see more openly Bitcoin politicians
Counterpoint: Bitcoin doesn't need Jack or Saylor
My point should not be interpreted to mean that an individual's contributions can't be valuable.
reply
that's not a counterpoint, I agree with that and it doesn't contradict any of my points - which are my predictions and not necessities
reply