pull down to refresh
101 sats \ 3 replies \ @Coinsreporter 20 May 2024 \ on: My conversation with Fast Talking Man openagents
Can you say that the fast talking man is nearly accurate? If so, it's not bad to thank it! I guess.
For finding answers, I support AI. But for writing, I don't.
Nearly accurate, I would think, but 100%? I couldn't tell you. But I think it would be a lot more honest than big Tech, bankers, and governments. As it could sort through data to find evidences, I suppose, no?
@Coinsreporter, I agree AI is not a replacement for writing. But to deliver certain news in a non-bias way, I don't think it's necessarily bad.
For example, China experiences earthquake 5.5 on Richie scale. 3 found dead.
^^again example
Someone going there to assess the damage is completely different from pulling from feeds
reply
Yes, I agree. For certain news, we can accept AI.
Also because it's a fact the the media presents any news with so much bias and exaggeration these days.
reply
right?!! you can't even get a clear description of what is inflation from news that the public has to look elsewhere for that information.
reply