@jimmysong was disappointed that you didn't answer my question on your podcast. You also called me a troll. I don't understand why. I'm not here to shill anything, my question didn't even mention a shitcoin by name. I think you should consider why you're afraid to answer this question.

nullcount

bitcoin

Listener Questions for my podcast 

jimmysong

Assume that a centralized shitcoin exists that provides useful privacy in areas where it would take more work or be more expensive to achieve comparable privacy on BTC.

If that shitcoin was somehow implemented as a privacy layer for BTC (perhaps with atomic swaps) such that you are never exposed to it's volatility or consensus rules. 
Would you consider using it? Would you still call it a shitcoin?

How is this different from something like Liquid or fedimints which also take a privacy vs decentralization tradeoff?