pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @nullcount 4 Aug 2022 \ on: Listener Questions for my podcast bitcoin
Assume that a centralized shitcoin exists that provides useful privacy in areas where it would take more work or be more expensive to achieve comparable privacy on BTC.
If that shitcoin was somehow implemented as a privacy layer for BTC (perhaps with atomic swaps) such that you are never exposed to it's volatility or consensus rules. Would you consider using it? Would you still call it a shitcoin?
How is this different from something like Liquid or fedimints which also take a privacy vs decentralization tradeoff?
write
preview
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nullcount 1 Sep 2022
@jimmysong was disappointed that you didn't answer my question on your podcast. You also called me a troll. I don't understand why. I'm not here to shill anything, my question didn't even mention a shitcoin by name. I think you should consider why you're afraid to answer this question.
reply