pull down to refresh

Imagine if Portugal were to split into independent states, who would get to keep the sporting titles?
This was the topic of a lively discussion among friends during a recent gathering. For instance, Portugal holds a European Championship trophy. Which state would claim ownership of the trophy? Some suggested it would go to the state with the most players on the winning team, while others believed it should belong to the state of the player who scored the victory goal.
We can extend this hypothetical scenario to the United States, considering what would happen if states became independent. For example, in the Olympics, which states would keep the medals? Share your thoughts on this hypothetical situation with fellow stackers.
I think for the Olympics, the medals belong to the individual athletes, and are recognized as belonging to the nation that existed at the time (so Yugoslavia, which won the gold medal in water polo in '88, its final Olympics as a nation, is still the "winner," instead of Croatia or another part of Yugoslavia).
That second part would apply to other sports, probably, but the trophy question's a tough one. I think the state with the most players is a better argument than the player with the victory goal (no "i" in "team," etc). But that's an easier call if one state dominates, tougher if three or four all have a number of players.
Another approach is to King Solomon it and just carve the trophy up. :-)
reply
I would probably assign the titles to wherever the team facilities were.
reply
The topic is about national titles in the international arena.
reply
There's still somewhere that they trained, though, right?
reply
Ah, okay! And what about titles for collective sports?
reply
Same. There's a team training facility somewhere.
reply