Here is an easy way to disprove it: imagine a poor person -- they know someone who is 2x poorer than them. Person 2x poorer than them is not dead.
This does not disprove anything. Sounds like a strawman fallacy. The survival of a poorer individual does not negate the potential hardship caused by a 5% dip in a volatile asset when used as the primary financial tool.
But what do I know, I am retarded.
Have you ever been in Argentina? There's a 5% dip here every single week (and, unlike bitcoin, it never rebounds back)
reply