pull down to refresh

By André Marques
Central banks intervene in order to “create demand,” and then they intervene in order to try to mitigate the damage they caused earlier. This is a never-ending scenario of economic destruction.
Rothbard on inflation:
The supply of funds for investment apparently increases, and the interest rate is lowered. Businessmen, in short, are misled by the bank inflation into believing that the supply of saved funds is greater than it really is. Now, when saved funds increase, businessmen invest in “longer processes of production,” i.e., the capital structure is lengthened, especially in the “higher orders” most remote from the consumer.
What fascinates me is how successful they have been to always make themselves look as the godsend saviours of the problems only they create.
reply
They have Stockholm Syndrome working to their advantage.
reply
In my experience from speaking to common people while I was deep down in politics, it's not even that, but a pristine ZERO knowledge and awareness on anything related to the matter. Some people even thought that the whole problem was caused by "daemons"
reply
It probably differs by electorate.
reply
Just end the fed, parliament in English/UK and whatever equivalent in other countries. Humans or the free market will find a way. They're importing more cattle, simply because they know the end is coming.
reply
I have a feeling that a lot of what they’re doing is because they think the end is coming.
reply
The end in what way?
reply
Americans aren't having children, so if a country has fewer children, you don't have growth and less debtors/slaves to keep the country running. This destroys the system, so by importing new cattle/immigrants you gain new debtors(that are born/indoctrinated) under the guise of freedom, if you've been following along with @Lux then a lot of this make sense.
Also, have you noticed they aren't even encouraging Americans to have children? In S. Korea, the government won't shut up about it. They'll even support the family that does have children after two. They'll help fund the child's education and whatever. But even then few Koreans, Japanese are having less children. Which is insane because the people in these countries are krazy smart.
reply
Immigration has always been important to the USA. It is a shame we are having less children, but all developed societies end up this way. There is not enough support in the system to have many kids like in the past.
reply
Well, from what I've seen in the US. Many Mexicans move to the US and live with extended families, so a typical 5room house can easily accommodate that. But the next generation of those children aren't going to want to live in extended homes. They'll want to have their own place and this has economical effects like having less children. Economics plays a huge role to if people will have children too. Afterall, we're not obligated to bare children.
South Korea is in an unprecedented genetic collapse, though. If the current fertility rate doesn't increase, it will be the fastest population collapse ever recorded.
Up until now, that record is held by the Native American population after first contact with European diseases.
reply
I feel like they're so many Koreans, I find this impossible unless we witness a "Spanish Influenza" like event again. Even though many people died during COVID-19, many survived too. Unless someone's got a graph of death to birth chart we can look up? @TomK
South Korea and also Japan. They dont have the public works to support having children. What really bothered me in Taiwan is that they are exploiting having babies. Companies have a spa service so that they take advantage of the house sitting after childbirth. I feel it really takes away from the family structure and traditions.
We have to find a way to keep the banks in check.
reply