Wallet Scrutiny created a Twitter thread recently. The Tweet that kicked off the thread is:
For the record:
We have never prioritized reviews based on donations and to our knowledge only one provider (Unstoppable) did donate to us at all.
We were asked repeatedly about the price to re-evaluate certain products but never agreed to such arrangements.
And this Tweet by the founder of Wallet Scrutiny, in response to Fiatjaf's Tweet which also happened to be on SN today:
But I'm more concerned about financing my project WalletScrutiny.com. I deem the content incredibly valuable and many experts agree but who should pay for it? It's currently geared towards early-coiners to raise their awareness of threat models. They would never pay.
reply