And this Tweet by the founder of Wallet Scrutiny, in response to Fiatjaf's Tweet which also happened to be on SN today: 

> But I'm more concerned about financing my project WalletScrutiny.com. I deem the content incredibly valuable and many experts agree but who should pay for it? It's currently geared towards early-coiners to raise their awareness of threat models. They would never pay.

https://twitter.com/LeoWandersleb/status/1555982693120315393
https://nitter.it/LeoWandersleb/status/1555982693120315393

cointastical

Wallet Scrutiny created a Twitter thread recently.  The Tweet that kicked off the thread is:

We have never prioritized reviews based on donations and to our knowledge only one provider (Unstoppable) did donate to us at all.

We were asked repeatedly about the price to re-evaluate certain products but never agreed to such arrangements.

https://twitter.com/WalletScrutiny/status/1555707192367513601

https://nitter.it/WalletScrutiny/status/1555707192367513601

bitcoin

 Reproducible Build Proofs: Wallet Scrutiny and BitcoinBinary

Wallet Scrutiny created a Twitter thread recently.  The Tweet that kicked off the thread is:

> For the record:
>
> We have never prioritized reviews based on donations and to our knowledge only one provider (Unstoppable) did donate to us at all.
>
> We were asked repeatedly about the price to re-evaluate certain products but never agreed to such arrangements.

https://twitter.com/WalletScrutiny/status/1555707192367513601
https://nitter.it/WalletScrutiny/status/1555707192367513601