The "end to post-truth" is so wrong that I assumed at first it was a typo. Signed blockchain attestations could happen (?) but will in no way compensate for the overwhelming shitstorm of nonsense in terms of how it populates people's internal realities.
Very few care. You can throw all the tools you want at a people problem. In the end they have to see a need before they use a tool. This is what is so absurd about this point to me.
reply