pull down to refresh
0 new comment
23 sats \ 0 replies \ @machuPikacchu 4 Jun 2024
Suppose we increase the blocksize "so that we can onboard 1 billion more people." Ok, but then instead of onboarding more people we may just have the existing users increase their transactions by 10x. Then what? Fees would have to compensate and you again crowd out the newcomers.
Changing the blocksize ultimately doesn't improve anything and in fact can weaken the network. Unless we can prove that something necessary can't be done without changes we shouldn't prematurely change things.
reply
0 new comment
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @justin_shocknet 4 Jun 2024
The pendulum has swung...
Communists are losing control of things Geopolitically...
They're regrouping on the digital battlefield by attacking Bitcoin
reply
0 new comment
48 sats \ 0 replies \ @eduardopro 4 Jun 2024
NO.
reply
0 new comment
13 sats \ 1 reply \ @freetx 4 Jun 2024
Currently blocks are clearing in the 19-29 sat/vb range. Increasing the blocksize could drive that down significantly.
What would happen to all the miners and the investments they made? I suppose it would destroy them? I guess none of this matters to those who are convinced that they need to keep fiddling with the protocol until they "perfect" it.
reply
0 new comment
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 5 Jun 2024
This is getting so tiresome
reply
0 new comment
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Bell_curve 5 Jun 2024
No
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheBTCManual 4 Jun 2024
Lol what for, so we can cook the remaining nodes faster?
reply
0 new comment