22 sats \ 7 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 4 Jun \ on: Stacker Saloon
Caraaaaalhooooo !
I've never seen a stacker in first or second. I was already suspicious! Congrats @Undisciplined !
https://m.stacker.news/33804
write
preview
100 sats \ 6 replies \ @Undisciplined 4 Jun
Oh, wow. I hadn't looked yet today. Those 675 sats are mine.
@k00b was in 3rd a couple of days ago. Maybe the top three aren't as impenetrable as they seemed.
reply
31 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b 4 Jun
If this holds we might’ve had a bug in our trust algo because we changed a parameter to that in the recent release.
reply
26 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 4 Jun
Did you un-nerf yourself to get into the top 3 or was that after changing that parameter?
I remember thinking your activity looked lower that day, if anything.
reply
47 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 4 Jun
Nothing changed wrt my nerfing. The change I’m talking about went live yesterday. Maybe the top 3 are offline though.
Prior to the change we accidentally gave @anon high initial trust in our trust graph which would mean anyone trusted by anon also got high trust.
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @0xbitcoiner 4 Jun
That was a bug that could be exploited.
Maybe the top 3 are offline though.
What do you mean ?
reply
90 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 4 Jun
There's been a persistent Top 3 of hidden stackers over the last few months (around when this trust bug went live).
That was a bug that could be exploited.
It could've been. It could've also just assisted certain people that didn't deserve it even if they were unintentionally exploiting it.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xbitcoiner 4 Jun
Let's tackle the first one! 🤠
reply