When I was into 💩🪙s I followed and used the eth roll ups, including Starkware. In my experience L2s other than LN are all about tokenizing finance. The L2 is for throughput and volume being too slow or expensive on main chains. They all seem to end up bringing across chains, so it seems like the path will go that way here, too.
I wonder what this means on support for zerosync from starkware? 🤔 Now that starkware wants in on bitcoin directly, will they impose constraints on zerosync good work?
Full on starknet with all the shitcoin incentives? 🫠 And OP_CAT at that ... 💀
I'm all in favor of zerosync making the base layer support zk proofs for settlement. Granting capacity of running a node with almost no resources requirements. But not starknet directly. We don't need it.
Next bridge-type 💩🪙ery
deleted by author
When I was into 💩🪙s I followed and used the eth roll ups, including Starkware. In my experience L2s other than LN are all about tokenizing finance. The L2 is for throughput and volume being too slow or expensive on main chains. They all seem to end up bringing across chains, so it seems like the path will go that way here, too.
deleted by author
I wonder what this means on support for zerosync from starkware? 🤔 Now that starkware wants in on bitcoin directly, will they impose constraints on zerosync good work?
Full on starknet with all the shitcoin incentives? 🫠 And
OP_CATat that ... 💀I'm all in favor of zerosync making the base layer support zk proofs for settlement. Granting capacity of running a node with almost no resources requirements. But not starknet directly. We don't need it.