pull down to refresh

Up until late August, Lightning Labs had capped the channel capacity and payment size for users of their popular implementation of the network to ~$2000 USD and ~$500 respectively to better protect user funds with experimental software.
When I see articles talking about LN in USD terms... I just laugh and stop reading anymore the rest of the article. Those OP are still living in the fiat mindset and will NEVER understand what is the role and the goal of Bitcoin.
FUCK'EM'ALL those that are still doing that. FFS over Bitcoin network we transact ONLY satoshis not dollars or any other crap fiat currency !
reply
I knew there was a channel size limit, but I did not know there was a payment size limit. Is that true?
reply
you don't get it... is about talking in USD and not in sats. There's no limit in opening channels.
reply
I do get what you are saying.
wumbo limit is 0.167... BTC not usd
reply
I haven't read this in a while! @south_korea_ln, you're absolutely right that this deserves a longer follow-up examining what I got right/wrong and how my opinions have changed.
I did write another LN post in Oct '21. But even that is now dated.
A few high level points that come to mind immediately:
  • I wrote OP paper in 2020 when I was working for another fund which focused on Ethereum and DeFi. At the time I was mostly into BTC, but did not yet have 100% conviction as I currently do. I was also trying mightily to get my fund interested in LN development, which was surprisingly challenging given how well they were doing (on paper at least) with DeFi projects like Uniswap
  • I eventually developed enough conviction to go all in on BTC/LN and launch my own fund in 2021 dedicated to investing in the ecosystem. Since then I've invested in >40 companies in the space and have never looked back :) At some point soon I'm planning to launch an updated website with all of my portcos. It's been really rewarding to invest fully in what I believe in
  • I'm still super bullish on LN though growth has been a bit slower than I imagined. I now see it increasingly as the glue between many different BTC neobanks (e.g. Cash App)& mints. I'm particularly bullish on ecash mints (Cashu and Fedimints) connected via the Lightning Network. @rodarmor was the first person to turn me onto this idea. Note I still do hold hope for non-custoidal LN scaling to the masses at some point
  • I'm particularly bullish on Nostr Wallet Connect (NWC) as the messaging layer for LN payments. I should have a new post on this soon
  • An area I've changed my mind on is how LN will interop with identity/data. Originally, I thought an LN pubkey would be universal identity for the Internet. And that BTC would grow in layers: BTC > LN > data. Similar to what @dhruv & @ryanthegentry discussed at the BTC Conference in 2021. I now think that Nostr will provide the pubkey identity and that the data will be transferred via Nostr with attached LN payments. Or as Dhruv explains nicely, I'm now more bullish on putting the payment inside the data rather than the data inside the payment.
Although in the long run, who knows?
Longer piece necessary, but TL;DR, I'm now bullish on a stack where:
  • Bitcoin is value
  • LN (+ ecash) is payments
  • Nostr is identity + data
Here's more on why I'm so bullish on Nostr as the identity/data layer: https://hivemind.vc/identity/
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @0fje0 10 Jun
Thanks for taking the time to respond. Looking forward to that longer piece.
putting the payment inside the data rather than the data inside the payment
I haven't seen this phrasing before. I like it.
reply
I'd love to have the author (Max Webster) revisit this 2020 opinion with how things have developed over the last 4 years.
reply
What do you think has been the biggest development in lightning over the last 4 years?
reply
In random order of importance:
  • Splicing
  • Better path-finding
  • Huge improvement in payment success rates
  • Realization that LN isn't perfect, yet is the best working thing we have
  • Increasingly being used for large transfers between big players rather than the misguided early marketing focusing only on near-free small payments
I'd say the biggest development is that hype has been replaced by realism, which is usually a good sign as most maturing technologies go through such phases.
reply
I'd say the biggest development is that hype has been replaced by realism, which is usually a good sign as most maturing technologies go through such phases.
+1
reply
Suddenly remembered where I heard his name before: Hivemind, a Bitcoin-focused VC company.
reply
Interesting! Thanks for sharing.
reply
121 sats \ 1 reply \ @0fje0 10 Jun
Isn't @MaxAWebster on SN?
reply
thanks for flagging!
reply
Faster than the speed of light
reply