I use zsh. It's great, but I don't use it for anything that bash can't provide. Fish is not POSIX-compliant (not that I care, and probably neither you), and excellent out of the box, you should try it

zsh ohmyz.sh

Can't say why I favor it, it just works well for me, autocomplete, configurability..

zsh for me too

fish is extremely good, especially for beginners.

Most notable features are very good autocompletion for many programs, as well as very intuitive history.

All of this can be done in other shells with custom scripts, addons and configuration, but fish provides all of this out of the box.

I love fish because it does everything for me out of the box.

I enjoy zsh if you absolutely need bash compatibility (I recommend just calling bash directly though) but I don’t like relying on third-party plugins like oh-my-zsh for something as essential and high security as the shell.

I use zsh because it's the default shell on MacOS. I try not to spoil myself too much with shells, because in the past I used to spend a lot of time on remote machines where I'd have to use a more Spartan shell.

Love the line "Bash in the past" and I don't know why...

I use windows 7,10,11 and macos , for Linux I also need some details about it,

is it usefull? Why should we use that? What's its benefits? Can it replace windows or macos?

I use PowerShell on Linux.

zsh, but in reality it's just small differences...

May I ask if it is your first debian or gnu/linux? What do you use on your battle laptop?

I have been a bash users for a long time. I've used zsh and I would say its the best alternative to bash.

zsh hands down

I like zsh the most. The only downside is that once you get used to it, it is very difficult to go back to bash ;)