121 sats \ 1 reply \ @anon 21 Jun \ parent \ on: The largest Lightning channel ever closed bitcoin
What do you mean? A channel that big could have easily done tens of thousands of big transactions in its lifetime, even if all the transactions went in the same direction.
I just find it interesting, the idea that it's cheaper to close a channel than it is to rebalance depending on the capacity of the channel.
I wonder how that capacity relates to position and topology.
reply