I think that this chart is a good one except for that highlighted Cash Flows section stating Bitcoin no.... It just seems to me that Bitcoin is a system of value communication that is completely opposite to the FIAT system.... Under FIAT you have inflation to the monetary supply making the which lessons the purchasing power of the future supply and On a Bitcoin System you have an ever increasing amount of purchasing power due to its scarce supply. In turn the entrepreneurs' that build business that excrete value the most will be the most successful in the long term (as they will be the business providing the most utility/value to their customers - of which they are looking for the best value for their Bitcoin)?? If the customer/consumer you are looking to attract is looking for the best value? Businesses that are able to lower their prices in BTC terms over term are going to be the successful businesses....not businesses that constantly need to refinance themselves in FIAT terms to keep up with inflation or businesses that are owned by people who spend more than they create? Those businesses will always be chasing the customer and offering discounts for paying in Bitcoin....vs....simply building a business that is creating more value than it is taking?

I guess now that I walk through all that - maybe the chart is right....its just that instead of looking at "no cash flow" as a negative on Bitcoin it is actually a positive and the negative here is the FIAT system with positive cash flow?

I am not sure that this concept comes through in Leon's article...I am not sure if I even articulated it correctly? It certainly makes some sense to me though - businesses need to incentivize their customers to participate in the Bitcoin economy and the only way to do that is to provide maximum value to them...???