When it comes to stablecoins, they claim to maintain stability by pegging their value to fiat currency. However, we all know how very unreliable fiat is. Just look at how the value of the dollar can fluctuate based on various economic factors. So, is calling a shitcoin that's pegged to fiat really the best way to ensure stability?
Let's consider an alternative - gold. Unlike fiat currency, gold has intrinsic value that is not dependent on any government or central bank. Throughout history, gold has been seen as a symbol of wealth and stability. Its value is not artificially inflated or deflated by government policies or economic conditions. So, if gold can maintain its value without being pegged to something else, why can't the people realize that there's Bitcoin, doing it much better?
Perhaps it's time for you to change your mindset of stability. Instead of relying on fiat currency, why not adopting Bitcoin, which, like gold, has proven to stand the test of time? By adopting Bitcoin, the users would be offered a more reliable store of value and avoid the pitfalls of fiat currency. It's time to think outside the box and redefine what it means to be truly stable.
Conclusion is, shitcoins, pegged to fiat, aren't stable in reality. Though people call and regard them as stablecoins.