pull down to refresh

Natalia is being deliberately naive to defend Islam
I'm not defending anything...just saying what I seen
reply
21 sats \ 4 replies \ @TomK 28 Jun
If you start to understand monotheistic religions as anger storage media, then the whole thing becomes obvious, which is why we are repeatedly confronted with extreme discharges of aggression, frustration and resentment.
reply
42 sats \ 1 reply \ @clr 28 Jun
If you start to understand monotheistic religions as anger storage media
Why do we have to defend "christianity" (whatever that means) then? Simply as a reaction to wokeness? What does it bring to the table?
reply
42 sats \ 0 replies \ @TomK 28 Jun
i do not believe that any of the old religions can be the answer to wokeism, which is nothing other than the rebirth of communism. this is a battle that we can only fight as individuals, resisting any form of symbol adaptation
reply
And then you add missionaries and pressure to convert… result is conflict and violence
We saw this after the printing press and reformation. 100 years of religious wars
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @TomK 28 Jun
Reading and studying the vita of Mohammed would be important for any muslim. But that's sth. they refuse.
reply