pull down to refresh
Right. And I disagreed with Reich being lumped in with the others and your response was he is not an economist.
Am I missing something?
He lumps the labor economist in with politicians
That's why I noted that he is not an economist.
Ah, disagree. I know PhDs in Physics and Chemistry who are advanced engineers and confer PHDs in Biomedical Engineering. They'll yell you they are both. One says I'm educated in Physics, but work as an engineer.
That's fine. I wasn't expecting this to turn into a debate about the meaning of "economist".
I am a labor economist and I don't think of him as one of us, because he wasn't trained in labor economics and he doesn't work as a labor economist. I can appreciate that these fine distinctions that are drawn within a field may not be shared by those outside the field.
Secretary of Labor is never an economist
And not just Labor. Any cabinet level position is a political appointment.
You’re missing everything
Reich should be lumped with the communists and progressives.
He is not an economist. You challenged us to verify and we did
I can't tell which side you arguing half the time. Sometimes both.
The original post is about how progressives, like Reich, don't understand that the Fed creates inequality when it inflates the money supply.