pull down to refresh

@nyan Kaspa might be better than Bitcoin technically and only thing that it seems to do better than bitcoin is scalability (more transactions on layer 1) but if you think from first principles thinking, do we really need scalability on layer 1? may be / may be not. what are the trade offs? obvious trade off is centralization due as only few people will be able to run their own nodes (as not all can store volume of transactions supported by kaspa locally). Owning bitcoin (and running bitcoin node) is like owning & running your own bank, is it for kaspa? i'm afraid i don't think so
obvious trade off is centralization due as only few people will be able to run their own nodes
There may be few of us running Kaspa nodes but as of now Kaspa's node takes 15GB on my PC. And its size is not going to grow linearly with the growth of historical transactions.
reply
deleted by author