100 sats \ 6 replies \ @fm 15 Jul \ on: What would change your conviction in bitcoin? bitcoin
I guess if… Satoshi nakamoto was really central intelligence And NSA would have facilitated the sha 256 as in a collab.. And it turned out to really be a psy-op to finance the black budget.. Then i would sell… Or not..
write
preview
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek OP 15 Jul
And NSA would have facilitated the sha 256 as in a collab..
You mean if a backdoor in sha256 was found?
Then i would sell…
I think we could hard fork in this case and start anew 🤔 But it's going to be hard to not let mining get captured immediately by the first one who builds an ASIC for the new hashing algorithm.
reply
100 sats \ 2 replies \ @fm 15 Jul
Remember that crypto AG scandal?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crypto_AG
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek OP 15 Jul
No, I don't! Interesting
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @fm 15 Jul
You should take a look into it.. It was up for decades.. I wonder what the actual ops are like today
reply
76 sats \ 0 replies \ @TwoLargePizzas 15 Jul
I think people underestimate the ability of Bitcoin core developers. They can read, understand and test the SHA256 code as well as any NSA employee.
If there was a back door it would've been found. This is one fear I don't lose sleep over
reply
50 sats \ 0 replies \ @fm 15 Jul
You mean if a backdoor in sha256 was found?
I was referring the fact sha 256 was developed by the NSA. That alone is kind of alarming.. But yes, NSA loves backdoors.. That would definitely mean the death of bitcoin
reply