I don't believe we can wait for the election to pass to address this issue. The Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act of 2024 (S.Amdt.2610) and the Safe Airspace for Americans Act (H.R. 6967) are imperative to continue combating the stigma and intentional obfuscation that has plagued this topic for far too long. This topic presents the best opportunity to pierce through the over-classification and gatekeeping that has stifled progression throughout history, consistently presenting itself in mutually supported evidence found during serious research into implicated parties.

As I've tried to understand and interpret the events that have transpired, I feel sorrow for pioneering figures in clean energy, such as SAIC's founder, Robert J. Beyster. Individuals like Beyster and their companies were positioned well to captivate the private interests-led era of the NHI coverup by continuing its legacy. The 1970s began an era where those in proximity to RS33, Manhattan Project, AEC, and Majestic 12 facilitated the continued R&D of this NHI portfolio, taking advantage of privileged access and knowledge. Founded in 1969, SAIC and competing interests appear to represent the origin point of corporate warfare between nuclear energy and fossil fuels that has impacted us all.

Beyster and others involved in the early development of U.S. nuclear technology due to their exposure to the Manhattan Project grew remorseful. Some witnessed their legacies contributing to global suffering. Between 1994 and 2004, these issues intensified, activities revealed that SAIC and parts of the Non-Human Intelligence (NHI) tech portfolio under their control had become splintered, potentially as a result of corporate espionage. To be clear, SAIC isn't alone in this. They have just been the focus of my research for this period. Over that time, I've been angry, impressed, sad, fascinated, and everything in between. At this point, I just want answers.

It appears that Beyster was forced out, and then Science Applications International (SAI) was taken public during 2004-2006. A cursory review of the Lockheed acquisition history from 2004 to 2012 offers some potential insight into suspected consolidation efforts of this NHI tech portfolio. From 2012, there appears to be a hostile corporate takeover and bifurcation within SAIC, likely as a result of SAIC finally paying the piper on multiple significant False Claims Act Settlements and repeated displays of financial fraud, waste, and abuse. Lockheed Martin shared responsibility in some of those settlements.

From the 1970s to 2012, Ernst and Young's Lead Audit Partner/Senior Advisory Partner for Lockheed Martin, AES, Gannett, General Dynamics, Booz Allen Hamilton, Marriott and more had familial ties with significant influence in federal appropriations, acquisitions, and accounting principles. This cohesive union in regulator & regulated allowed for advantaged legislation and financial incentives that enabled the unfathomable international sprawl that is the true nature of these hidden programs and the resulting portfolio.

In 2013, SAIC split into Leidos and SAIC. At this point, both entities and their subsidiaries are utilized as Lockheed Martin's arms as part of an aggressive strategy to consolidate and monopolize this NHI/UFO tech portfolio. Lockheed Martin, SAIC, and Leidos worked in the same direction to completely captivate appropriations, institutional talent, and entrusted responsibility in Medical Research, Federal Health Services, Govt IT, Artificial Intelligence, and Cybersecurity. Each company and its well-executed M&A strategy deserves scrutiny.

A review of corporate history, credible claims, and the questions my research raises gain clarity when evaluating their potential relation to recent developments in the legislative field. Strong codification and bipartisan efforts for transparency in Non-Human Intelligence, Unidentified Flying Objects, Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, and Ocean-Surface and Undersea Craft are not to be ignored. Ongoing investigations, spanning decades appear to have informed legislation and action actively working to wrest control of crucial secrets from the remaining gatekeepers.

Objectively analyzing the Pentagon's approach to Non-Human Intelligence exposes significant national security risks. Overclassification and compartmentalization affect the ability to develop NHI-derived technologies competitively. This is exacerbated by intentional ignorance and stigma cast on the public, who remain uninformed about the risks of a new paradigm where humans are not at the top of every food chain. We must take this opportunity to strengthen Human Rights and Non-Human Rights, to account for this new paradigm shift.

Supporting evidence of this paradigm shift includes recently enhanced whistleblower protections, improved reporting mechanisms, strengthened inspector general authorities, and continued reshaping of oversight and infrastructure of the DoD and Intelligence Communities. Additionally, the Department of Justice's antitrust subpoenas into SAIC, and SEC and FBI whistleblower program developments show an inter-agency effort in pursuing the claims that I perceive to run parallel to UAPTF investigations. Accountability and forgiveness are required to properly acknowledge the stifling this has affected human progress. We must understand our history to learn from our mistakes and move forward through education.

It appears as though the Executive branch and Congress are attempting to regain proper congressional oversight with executive branch enforced checks and balances to gain control of declassification. Proposed UAPDA 2024 legislation includes eminent domain, strong centralized appropriations considerations, and a civilian led review board. Additional academic insight, increased data analysis, materials study and research, and well-crafted legislation will be needed to finally bring this topic to the light as it deserves.

Lockheed Martin has secured an incredible grip on international operational support and planetary defense. I believe this company and its subsidiaries have executed a business strategy that is of great concern to some federal agencies. including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Department of Defense Inspector General (DoD IG), Intelligence Community Inspector General (IC IG), Department of Justice Antitrust Division, AAWSAP/AATIP, and the Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force (UAPTF).

The following transactions and relationships warrant congressional scrutiny, especially considering that specific federal appropriations and acquisitions may have occurred, informed by privileged knowledge and impactful conflicts of interest that allowed decisions to be made outside of proper congressional authority. These conflicts could have been avoided by granting congressional oversight authority to individuals prioritizing the stakeholders' interests. Our legislature must begin to reflect this desire in its constituency.

This cover-up is self-inflicted; the most effective solution is to bring it to light. Maybe I'm wrong. It's time to ask in front of Congress, I think.

From 2004 to 2006, Robert J. Beyster was forced out of Science Applications International (SAI), which then went public. Between 2004 and 2012, Lockheed Martin's acquisition history reveals efforts to consolidate the "alleged NHI technology-derived portfolio." From 2012 to 2014, SAIC underwent a corporate takeover and bifurcation, likely due to significant False Claims Act settlements and repeated instances of financial fraud, waste, and abuse, with Lockheed Martin sharing responsibility in some of these settlements.

In 2013, SAIC split into Leidos and SAIC. At this point, both entities and their subsidiaries appeared to act as extensions of Lockheed Martin's aggressive strategy to consolidate and monopolize the NHI/UFO tech portfolio. This involved monopolizing specific areas of the aerospace and defense sector, including research, development, and distribution of medical services, federal health services, government IT services, artificial intelligence, and cybersecurity. I believe the dominance is being investigated by the Department of Justice Antitrust division.

In 2016, Leidos acquired Lockheed's Information Technology (IS&GS) business unit using $1.8 billion in cash to Lockheed. Lockheed Martin shareholders received 50.5% equity in Leidos through a highly effective tax-efficient merger called a Reverse Morris Trust. This transaction was positioned as "Leidos is acquiring Lockheed tech," but Lockheed effectively acquired Leidos, as the transaction gave majority control to Lockheed Shareholders via Abacus Innovations Corporations.

In Joe Rogan's interview, Grusch explains the supposed beginnings of AAWSAP/AATIP and shares a story suggesting that the CIA interfered with Lockheed Martin's planned divestment of UFO-related materials. Rather than allowing these materials to be transferred to Bigelow Aerospace, I believe that the CIA influenced Lockheed to divest their materials through a strategic business transaction involving Pacific Architects and Engineers, Inc. (PAE), a defense contractor noted for their CIA entanglement dating back to Operation Pheonix.

Antarctica was of great interest to the same individuals responsible for facilitating Project Manhattan via conduits like the National Science Foundation (NSF). This is evident in the organized execution of the 1957-1958 International Geophysical Year (IGY) that ultimately led to the creation of NASA. The National Science Foundation awarded Lockheed Martin $2 billion for Antarctica support in 2011.

As noted in my cursory review of Lockheed's transactions from 2004-2012, Pacific Architects and Engineers, Inc. (PAE) was sold by Lockheed Martin in 2011. Lockheed then hired PAE in 2012 to maintain the Antarctica contract. Leidos has been the owner of the primary contract owner since 2017, and it generates $200M a year. It has been challenging. McMurdo, the hub of US operations, has received various reports of women being victims of sexual harassment. This facility is funded by the Antarctica contract Leidos and PAE maintain.

I provided a conclusion statement, explanation, and additional information in my 1-year research bookmark post I did yesterday. However, I wanted to provide a few ideas listed in that post for others to consider. From my perspective, I believe participation in or supporting these initiatives may aid in securing transparency and Disclosure related to Non-Human Intelligence, Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena, Ocean-Surface and Undersea Craft.

Important Disclaimer: The list below is meant to inform about organizations and individuals shaping my understanding of this topic. There are many conclusions I've made that many would disagree heavily with. I also can't entirely agree with many of them on things. The important thing is to not fully "trust" anyone and discern for yourself. I understand if the request is made for me to remove a link, and I will remove it, no questions asked.

I've categorized the following in alphabetical order: