pull down to refresh
175 sats \ 3 replies \ @TNStacker 19 Jul
By further inflating the $USD.
reply
44 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 19 Jul
Speculative attack inside job.
reply
121 sats \ 1 reply \ @orthwyrm 19 Jul
deleted by author
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TNStacker 19 Jul
Further printing compounds the problems we are experiencing now. It is geometric not exponential growth, so it explodes eventually.
reply
43 sats \ 9 replies \ @grayruby 19 Jul
Easy. Transfer the Bitcoin the Justice department holds from seizures to the US treasury. Done.
reply
63 sats \ 8 replies \ @Satosora 20 Jul
I think there is a law against it.
All seized assets eventually have to go to auction.
reply
23 sats \ 5 replies \ @grayruby 20 Jul
I am sure they can find a way around it if they really wanted to.
reply
63 sats \ 4 replies \ @Satosora 20 Jul
I dont know, they could just bid on them if they really want them.
Its not actually their assets.
They cant legally keep them.
reply
34 sats \ 3 replies \ @grayruby 20 Jul
If it’s not legally their asset why are they allowed to auction them and keep the proceeds. Where does the money go when the justice dept auctions assets?
reply
63 sats \ 2 replies \ @Satosora 20 Jul
I dont want to sound like an ahole, but I am not sure on this.
I think the department that seizes it gets a percentage of it put into their budget?
reply
33 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 20 Jul
I wasn’t trying to be a smart ass with my question. Sorry if it came off that way. I am from Canada I don’t know how any of it functionally works. I assumed auction proceeds would just go directly to the treasury which would effectively be the same as sending the bitcoin to the treasury but I have no idea. You could be right. They may legally need to auction it and the dept keeps the proceeds as part of their financing:
reply
63 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 20 Jul
Yeah, I am not 100% sure.
I know they sold a bunch of the silk road bitcoins.
They went to a Tim Draper.
reply on another page
63 sats \ 0 replies \ @jgbtc 20 Jul
I'm pretty sure they can do whatever the hell they want. They just need a judge to interpret it the right way and presto, it's all nice and legal.
reply
13 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 20 Jul
...and that's a good thing. We want all seized assets to be auctioned fairly so we know what they're actually worth.
Government can always use the USD from the sale to buy more BTC with only a few % of slippage. That's totally worth it to fight corruption.
reply
15 sats \ 0 replies \ @nichro 19 Jul
I've always wondered about the practical way these things are set up at the nation state or corporate level.
I know it wouldn't be the Fed Chair just holding single sig keys.
But say it's a 11 out of 14 multisig like Liquid. What happens when some of em get let off, and personnel changes? Do they remake a multisig from scratch or is one of the keys just handed over (which is a fail lol)?
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @0xIlmari 19 Jul
I imagine it involves buying Bitcoin.
Failing that, stealing is an option.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satosora 19 Jul
They could easily invest in gold.
Or bitcoin, imagine that.
reply