Make Value4Value and podcasting 2.0 a Bitcoin-focused effort!
Show your support for this change to the documentation and maybe the maintainers will approve it.
Here's a TL;DR of the controversy so far...
The Podcasting 2.0 specification was designed to be open to alternative "currencies" to fulfill the value 4 value functions. However, most shitcoins would not work due to high fees and slow confirmations. The maintainers have chosen to name a specific shitcoin as an example of one currency that "could" be used to replace LN in a value4value implementation.
Some believe there's no harm in mentioning the shitcoin as an alternative, others believe it serves as an endorsement.
One contributor suggests to remove anything that isn't required to implement podcasts2.0 from the spec. There should be a separate section at the end for "future considerations" to mention the shitcoins.
What's your opinion?