pull down to refresh
63 sats \ 31 replies \ @didiplaywell 30 Jul \ parent \ on: Deconstructing Mileinomics econ
I would like to hear your take on that! I can not extract one from the article.
Is it possible for you to reach whoever wrote the article? The final paragraph is simply wrong, Milei has always been repetitive and explicit on what the progression of the reform plan was, and it can be deemed to be advancing faster than initially expected, even by himself. There is no "he knows but doesn't want to" whatsoever.
I always risk being looked at as a fanatic when I defend him, but I guess that stems from observers and opinologists showing off their ignorance and lack of pragmatism, making corrections such a routine that seems vicious rather than rational.
To counter that I always offer a list of my own observations on things he has done wrong and I myself don't forgive, not because he made them but because he insists in the error.
I have no more ability to contact the author than anyone else does. I'm happy to try though, if you like.
My point was just that we sometimes use "complicated character" as a phrase to describe someone who differs from our expectations. It doesn't have to mean they complicate things. It's just that if you were to describe them, there's no convenient reference point.
reply
No worries! No rush on contacting him, I came to associate you with that site :P , that's why I asked. Thank you :)
That's even more interesting to me: is there absolutely no reference point? No person you could associate with his image? I'm always attentive because I think the USA needs one. The closest to his histrionic character (within politics) might be Mr. Beast, who has announced his intentions to run for president in the future
reply
There probably are reference points, but they would be considered odd-ball characters who strike people as incongruous with leadership positions.
reply
Odd ball characters are a feature not a bug when trying to upend or destroy the status quo
reply
Absolutely, but I see what's @Undisciplined point: the ones who see the odd-ball are indeed not guided by such an obvious pragmatism as you point out, but by the traditional forms they're used to. The exact same thing happened here: NO boomer voted for Milei until there wasn't any other choice. Before that, they voted for another socialist, citing that he was "groomed", while Milei was "just crazy". Younger generations came to understand why 80 years of uninterrupted socialist decline where possible by seeing such an idiotic stance.
reply
Many boomers voted for Biden because he was a "moderate" not a socialist/radical.
Biden was not moderate but pretended to be one and many boomer voters were gullible to believe him
reply
Exactly, same thing here. God I hate the boomers...
reply
I see. It always boils down to the same: the USA will have to wait for the newer young generations to have enough weight to allow for such a paradigm change, just like it happened here. The challenge is to ensure that new generation hasn't been brainwashed by socialist propaganda by then. The cultural battle must be relentless
reply
Ronald Reagan said the same thing, not exact words but the gist.
The fight for liberty and freedom is never ending.
Only takes one generation for socialists to defeat capitalism and freedom.
reply
Absolutely. It's an eternal truth that freedom is an eternal battle.
reply
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same."
-- Ronald Reagan
reply
His speeches are the most libertarian stances I have heard from a president after Washington. Reagan is also the only president to have delivered a speech praising the father of our (originally) libertarian constitution, Juan Bautista Alberdi (the one Milei praises and seeks to re-establish):
This is likely why we get generational political cycles. Second and third generations tend to squander their inheritances.