pull down to refresh

Amazing speeches, unimpressive administration. He gave a speech in 1964, while campaigning for Barry Goldwater, that is probably the greatest speech I've ever heard.

I fully agree. I appreciate Reagan words, but accompanying such sacred words with such a bad administration had the catastrophic consequence of people associating the bad consequences to the ideas he promoted.

reply

Reagan was great. Memory is selective. People forget how terrible Carter was and the 1970s stagflation and gasoline ⛽️ lines and shortages

Which of Reagan successors have been more impressive? Bush? Clinton? Obama?

reply

Being not as bad as Bush, Clinton, or Obama is not the standard for doing a good job.

reply

Fair enough

edit: You raise an interesting point: maybe the Revolution led by Newt Gingrich was more impressive

How would you grade Speaker Newt who was backstabbed by his own party in 1998 (fucking idiots/traitors)?

reply

The Carter years were horrible. Reagan changed that. Inflation fell to 5 percent after a decade of double digit inflation. The economy grew by 7 percent in 1983 and 1984 after a decade of stagflation. The Berlin Wall fell in 1989 after he said tear down that wall in his 1987 speech in Berlin. The Cold War ended because the Russians were scared by Star Wars defense initiative. On his first day in office Iran freed the hostages.

He made Americans feel great again and confident about the future. He fixed the crisis of confidence in America

reply

Being not as bad as Carter doesn't mean he lived up to his rhetoric. The budgets were out of control. The military industrial complex metastasized.

The Cold War ended because central planning doesn't work and the Soviet Union collapsed under the weight of their accumulated misallocations.

reply

Spending was high because he increased defense spending which became dangerously low under detente

of course central planning doesn't work and yet it continues no thanks to academia

The end of the Soviet Union has increased support for capitalism and freedom? lol, the opposite

Kamala Harris: equality isn't enough, we need equity and equal outcomes

reply