pull down to refresh

Airgapped devices and secure software are not so easy to set up.
HWWs do, in fact, make it easier to achieve an airgaped secure environment. If you need to sign txns often, then maybe a HWW will be worthwhile investment.
Or if you're a highly targeted individual (like someone widely known to manage secrets for an exchange or whale) then you might benefit from the esoteric security features from HWW.
However, if you only need to sign once or twice per year (for example). Or if you're a pleb who isn't being targeted, then HWW might not make economic sense.
It might be more worthwhile to setup a secure airgap from scratch each time you need to sign. It maybe takes 10mins to download, verify, flash and boot TailOS, load your seed and sign.
None of this nuance is ever addressed in HWW advertising. They want you to believe its impossible to keep a secret without one.
reply
20 sats \ 3 replies \ @Fabs 6 Aug
"Economic sense" oh gimme a break!
People here probably have thousand's, if not ten's of thousand's in Bitcoin, but $100 - $200 for a professional and secure way to store and access said funds aren't worthwhile?
"Economic sense" my ass, dude.
"I DIY'ed my own hww, but can't access it anymore, help" will probably be his next post 🙄
reply
Lol...hardware wallets cost more than my current amount of bitcoin... I'm not setting anything up now. I'm just trying to learn. 😀
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fabs 6 Aug
In that case, no, settle for a desktop wallet instead (Sparrow).
reply
unfortunately i agree with this. are hw wallets perfect? no. but for most non-techy people, which is the great majority, they are a huge improvement in security. flasing tails is probably above the knowledge level of most bitcoiners.
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @ChrisS 6 Aug
Fair points.
reply
Ngmi
reply