pull down to refresh

Hostile58.0%
Neutral22.0%
Tolerant18.0%
Maximalist (a la RFK)2.0%
50 votes \ poll ended
I picked neutral, since she might not state a policy position. That seems to be her strategy so far.
reply
she will be instructed in what to say and what to believe and will probably be instructed to appear neutral but in reality be hostile. for some reason she likes this kind of game?
edited
reply
I have no doubt that she's hostile to all sentient life on this planet, but this was just about what her policy is going to be.
reply
In order to pander to the people that are looking at Trump, dont you think she will take a more extreme approach? Promise more than Trump is promising?
reply
So far she is putting very little forward in terms of policy. I think she’s just going to hope that not being Trump is enough to win and not risk alienating voters by taking positions on stuff.
reply
Right, I dont think that will work long term. I thought she hasnt put anything out because she needed to study up on it?
reply
She ran for president in the last election and was a senator before that. She's taken positions on everything before, so not taking any positions now is strategic.
reply
I guess it might work. We will have to wait and see what comes of it.
202 sats \ 3 replies \ @quark 11 Aug
It could be whatever Blackrock decides on the matter ;)
reply
That's the right answer.
reply
Agree, though, equally, whatever Trump does is instructed by Putin and other war criminals, banksters and gangsters...
reply
Hey look, it's the last person on Earth who believes the Russia Gate hoax.
reply
According to me, it is hostile
reply
Hostile in what way?
reply
Because politicians are never neutral on any point. She /He wants to do all the things for his/her own benefit.
reply
What else can we expect from Kamala after she's been too silent on economics in America after she took over the campaign from Biden?
Hostile, hostile and only hostile.
Now, Walz is also there to support the hostility.
reply
Look at Biden. Don't expect it to differ.
reply
You reckon she’s gonna have the same handlers?
reply
All ready does no doubt.
reply
My bet is that she gets more draconian handlers or at least more draconian orders since they blatantly got away with a lot in these past 4 years.
But that may be just me being a doomer. Hopefully I’m wrong.
reply
Well, I'm sure if they are able to pull the same kind of bullshit off as they were before, they'd certainly try that out. I don't think she's going to get that chance though.
reply
Let’s hope you’re right!
reply
Hostile to mining Hostile to self custody Positive for kyc “safe” “crypto”
reply
Hostile for sure. I expect the she will be a continuation of the current administration, just with a different figurehead.
reply
She will do as she is told to do.
reply
I’m almost entirely sure it’d be hostile. She’s got nothing to lose from chasing Bitcoiners and everything to win perception-wise by ‘hunting greedy capitalists that avoid paying their fair share.’
reply
Same as Biden , they don’t care
reply
11 sats \ 0 replies \ @Golu 12 Aug
The natural choice is that she will be same as Biden
reply
The honey badger appears somewhat indifferent.
reply
If you concur with her ranking that she was even farther left than Warren when she was a Senator, I'd expect her to carry the torch unless Ro's Pro-Crypto Army can somehow defeat Warren's Anti-Crypto Army.
reply
Kamala will definitely be hostile towards bitcoin.
reply
Tolerant, but if she keeps Gensler and Yellen around? Doom and gloom. But, Bitcoin won’t care either way!
reply
Whatever Trump says
reply
I think she will be hostile towards bitcoin, but friendly towards stablecoins and alts
reply
I think she will be a maxi. How else will she compete with trump?
reply
Seeing how the Democratic party has been with Bitcoin before, I don't expect that much will change with Harris.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @MB 11 Aug
I think she will be neutral as there is lots of US investment via EFTs etc. She will have seen the reaction Trump got last week at the Bitcoin conference and will definitely want to appear more open to Bitcoin prior to the election. If she is elected it might be a different story though, guess we will have to wait and see….
reply
She will appear neutral and wont know the stuff etc. she signs will be hostile but she wont care either :)
reply
she might be tolerant as long as the public buys her own token of allegiance and does not criticize it in favor of bitcoin.
reply
She’s left and woke. It’s super obvious she’ll be hostile.
reply
I doubt she'll have any policies. She'll not be the POTUS, neither.
reply
definitely hostile
reply