she will be instructed in what to say and what to believe and will probably be instructed to appear neutral but in reality be hostile. for some reason she likes this kind of game?
In order to pander to the people that are looking at Trump, dont you think she will take a more extreme approach?
Promise more than Trump is promising?
So far she is putting very little forward in terms of policy. I think she’s just going to hope that not being Trump is enough to win and not risk alienating voters by taking positions on stuff.
She ran for president in the last election and was a senator before that. She's taken positions on everything before, so not taking any positions now is strategic.
Well, I'm sure if they are able to pull the same kind of bullshit off as they were before, they'd certainly try that out. I don't think she's going to get that chance though.
I’m almost entirely sure it’d be hostile. She’s got nothing to lose from chasing Bitcoiners and everything to win perception-wise by ‘hunting greedy capitalists that avoid paying their fair share.’
If you concur with her ranking that she was even farther left than Warren when she was a Senator, I'd expect her to carry the torch unless Ro's Pro-Crypto Army can somehow defeat Warren's Anti-Crypto Army.
I think she will be neutral as there is lots of US investment via EFTs etc. She will have seen the reaction Trump got last week at the Bitcoin conference and will definitely want to appear more open to Bitcoin prior to the election. If she is elected it might be a different story though, guess we will have to wait and see….