pull down to refresh
68 sats \ 11 replies \ @didiplaywell 11 Aug \ parent \ on: Echoes of Empire: Gibbon’s Classic on Rome’s Fall and Its Lessons for Bitcoiners BooksAndArticles
Ok! Would you mind making a post underscoring the basics?
reply
Cool! :)
reply
Victor Davis Hanson has written about the fall of Rome, directly and indirectlyl
I also use ai/LLM lol
from Brave search ai:
Gibbon's work estimated far smaller numbers of Christian martyrs than had been traditionally accepted, questioning the Church's version of its early history.
By presenting a more nuanced and critical account of early Christianity, Gibbon challenged the Church's dominance over historical narrative.
Responding to Enlightenment Perspectives
Gibbon's emphasis on the "triumph of barbarism and religion" over the Roman Empire highlighted the role of religion in shaping historical events, aligning with Enlightenment thinkers' focus on the power of ideas.
His critique of organized religion, particularly Christianity, reflected the Enlightenment's skepticism towards dogma and superstition.
Gibbon's use of primary sources and rational approach to history embodied the Enlightenment's values of reason and empiricism.
New Insights
Gibbon's recognition of Islam's rapid rise and its role in the decline of the Roman Empire challenged the prevailing European view of Islam as a static and unchanging entity.
- His portrayal of the Byzantine Empire's fate as equally influenced by both Christianity and Islam expanded the scope of Enlightenment historiography, acknowledging the complexity of religious and cultural interactions.
reply
I'm unable to blame any bad economical macro performance to anything but bad economic policies unless in the context of major and lasting cataclysms. No bad moral lasts in a context that rewards good morals economically, and vice-versa. Morals are never a driver, but a consequence of the context. Even today islam hasn't caused, and is ages from being able to cause, as much damage to Europe as Europe has inflicted to itself, by itself entirely. It's never a matter of conservatives vs liberals nor christians vs islamists, but solely about libertarianism vs socialism, i.e, freedom vs fascism.
reply
Very good point
Perhaps the other lines of demarcation are noise, a distraction. Maybe not lines of demarcation but lines of distraction
reply
Indeed Sr, that's a precise way to put it.
reply
reply
lol
You have to disagree with me to trick the others!
There is a high correlation between cultural and religious and liberty
I remember in one of his interviews Milei warned: Gramsci 101!
Edit:
reply
It’s easy being socialist in a free country
It’s impossible being libertarian in a socialist country
reply
It would be nice for SN to allow wiki-style posts so that this kind of topics can grow collaboratively on everyone's contributions, as yours. Hopefully it's on the roadmap
reply
I added to my initial comment but forgot to "edit"
Brave search ai content is the "new" content
reply