pull down to refresh

39 sats \ 12 replies \ @Satosora 11 Aug \ parent \ on: Should the US Government Acquire a Bitcoin Reserve? • Listen on Fountain bitcoin
Right, I can understand that. But it would have been nice if it wasnt a huge political platform. By people who dont even understand the ecosystem.
write
preview
20 sats \ 11 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 11 Aug
People talking about bitcoin a lot will happen prior to people talking about it accurately, especially if it becomes highly political.
reply
24 sats \ 10 replies \ @Satosora 11 Aug
Yes, l realize this is part of it being adopted fully into society. Just not sure Trump or Harris are the people we want for that.
reply
20 sats \ 9 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 11 Aug
They definitely aren't, but we were never going to get to choose.
reply
30 sats \ 8 replies \ @Satosora 12 Aug
We wont get to choose. Im also worried what will happen if they adopt bitcoin, then make a huge mining facility trying to get the 51%. That would really rip some seams.
reply
30 sats \ 7 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 12 Aug
From what I understand, a 51% attack actually requires far more than 51%, because of the probabilities involved.
I suppose it's possible they would pursue that, but I don't think it's likely.
reply
26 sats \ 6 replies \ @Satosora 12 Aug
Its highly unlikely, but I dont rule it out. Especially once they get in their mind that they could control the whole blockchain by doing that.
reply
20 sats \ 5 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 12 Aug
Wouldn't people just stop using it, though? It seems like a very crude and expensive attack on bitcoin savings. Considering that many mainstream investors hold Bitcoin now, I'm not sure why they'd want to do this.
reply
37 sats \ 4 replies \ @Satosora 12 Aug
If they can get a 51% attack, they could potentially increase the amount of bitcoin. IF bitcoin gets as big as everyone thinks, wont that be worth it?
view replies