pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 13 Aug \ parent \ on: On Toxic People mostly_harmless
Do you have a problem with The New Yorker as a source?
Or would you like to question the facts and issues raised in the article?
New Yorker is not a reliable source
Your source is also from 2022
The topic of this post is Toxic People
reply
'Your source is also from 2022'
Yes- The source was published days before the invasion of Ukraine.
'The topic of this post is Toxic People'
Yes and in my initial comment I explained why I raise this issue-
Raising this because while you celebrate Bitcoiners ability to engage in sound reasoned debate, some major relevant issues seem to remain ignored or denied.
Sometimes it feels like the Bitcoin community only wants to hear the good news and not deal with real and potential challenges.
reply
What is a 'reliable' source in your opinion?
What content in the article I linked do you think is unreliable?
My impression is that most of the MSM and social media have NOT covered the treaty signing between China and Russia that came days before the invasion of Ukraine- yet this seems to me to be a very relevant and important piece of reporting and still highly relevant to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.
How does reporting on this very significant event when most(all?) other 'news' outlets remained silent make The New Yorker 'unreliable'?
reply