77 sats \ 3 replies \ @patrick1 15 Aug \ parent \ on: SILENT PAYMENTS ARE COMING TO BETTER PROTECT BITCOIN USERS bitcoin
I think he's wondering if ZKPs could be used to speed up the scanning process, not for sending/receiving.
write
preview
21 sats \ 2 replies \ @Rsync25 OP 15 Aug
First, it would be necessary add soft fork in some cases. Second, it is necessary soft forks, which are consequences? New block size wars? It is still very early for make integration into Bitcoin.
reply
93 sats \ 1 reply \ @patrick1 15 Aug
I assume he's talking about the client-side ZKPs that can be used to sync/verify a node very quickly, not something at the protocol level.
reply
97 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rsync25 OP 15 Aug
One thing is ZKPs via CSV like ZeroSync, BitVM, RGB. Another is create “force” via hype or whatever a soft fork to ZKPs
reply