Braiins Mini Miner - BMM 101 (pre-order 12/2024) \ stacker news ~bitcoin

Braiins Mini Miner - BMM 101 (pre-order 12/2024)shop.braiins.com/products/braiins-mini-miner-bmm-101-pre-order-12-2024

480 sats \ 20 comments \ @WeAreAllSatoshi 18 Aug bitcoin_Mining

Apparently Braiins already has a second version of the BMM 100 available for preorder, the BMM 101.

This updated model is listed as having:

WiFi support
a larger display
And enhanced cooling

Presumably that means the hash rate is equivalent to the original version.

IMO, $100USD (50%) more than the original model for the listed enhancements seems a bit steep, but who knows.

Any stackers signed up to get one?

view all related items

199 sats \ 2 replies \ @TheWildHustle 18 Aug

Was torn between that and one of those Bitaxe Max's.

The thing looks sleek, but those Bitaxe plebs might have more interesting stuff coming down the pipeline.

131 sats \ 0 replies \ @Zk2u 18 Aug

Even prebuilt bitaxes are cheaper, but those don’t have screens. Not sure about the hash rate but I prefer it being open source when buying something as niche as a mini miner

85 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 18 Aug

I’m just a nerd and find all of them fascinating

621 sats \ 4 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 18 Aug

Pretty bad IMO that the webpage does not even give the mining capacity and power consumption of the device or is that too much to ask?

146 sats \ 3 replies \ @OT 18 Aug

Exactly

That was what I was looking for. Having no info is a bit suspect

131 sats \ 2 replies \ @Zk2u 18 Aug

Not sus, just likely they haven’t finalised it yet. Power consumption certainly they won’t know until they finalise their designs

100 sats \ 1 reply \ @Solomonsatoshi 18 Aug

And yet they have set their price already and are taking orders...definitely not a good look. How can people assess whether they want to buy a miner at whatever price without basic performance data? How can they reasonably compare with other products to make an informed decision to buy? They can't! Treat consumers with some basic respect. Provide all relevant technical data BEFORE asking people to commit to purchase.

56 sats \ 0 replies \ @Zk2u 18 Aug

Agreed 100%.

121 sats \ 2 replies \ @itsMoro 18 Aug

hows the sound one of these produces, anyone used one?

100 sats \ 1 reply \ @Solomonsatoshi 18 Aug

None have been sold yet- they are not even finalised in final appearance. Manufacturer is not even providing basic performance data.

Just expecting people to buy on blind faith. Do not trust- verify!

25 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 18 Aug

I assume it’s pretty similar to the 100 model, aside from the listed enhancements. But I agree, more details should be provided given they’re accepting orders

21 sats \ 0 replies \ @sangekrypto 18 Aug

It looks like a new product, I think it's easier to use and maybe the configuration is less complicated.

100 sats \ 1 reply \ @Silent_Hodler 19 Aug

Is this for "lottery mining" or would you use it in a pool?

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @WeAreAllSatoshi OP 19 Aug

You could use it for either. I think most people probably agree that it wouldn't produce very much in a pool, so you're better off lottery mining with a chance to win big.