reply on: Highly available Lightning node cluster setup guide \ stacker news ~lightning

pull down to refresh

10 sats \ 4 replies \ @031ef7d322 18 Aug \ parent \ on: Highly available Lightning node cluster setup guide lightning

deleted by author

Is leader election supported for Postgres?

No, leader election is not supported by Postgres itself since it doesn't have a mechanism to reliably determine a leading node. It is, however, possible to use Postgres as the LND database backend while using an etcd cluster purely for the leader election functionality.

This is wrong though. You can construct something like an expiring lock in Postgres.

116 sats \ 2 replies \ @031ef7d322 18 Aug

I would guess it’s more common for application developers to reach for a tool more specific to the use case, like etcd, zookeeper, or consul.

You’re right that LND could potentially use advisory locks, which might make sense to eliminate an entire dependency when postgres is used as the backend.

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/explicit-locking.html#ADVISORY-LOCKS

105 sats \ 1 reply \ @031ef7d322 18 Aug

Relevant issue from 2022: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/6894

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 18 Aug

Nice find.

If Postgres is already a single point of failure in the cluster, there’s not much sense in alsp having etcd as a dependency.