pull down to refresh
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 2 Sep 2022 \ parent \ on: Andreas Antonopoulos - The Death of Money - PART 1/2 bitcoin
Okay, I found following definitions:
He already interviewed white males in podcasts and I don't think he mentioned that he will never interview a white male ever again. So I don't see a "continued unfair advantage" or "unfair or harmful treatment" of white males here.
He's a white male himself. So this definition does not apply, either.
I don't see how he suggested that one race is "better" than the other. I also don't think it is unfair treatment to ask for non-white, non-male interviewees, especially because he mentioned he already has interviewed "almost all" white male podcasters.
All three above are from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/racism
The following is from Google Search:
This may apply. However, only depending on how you define "discrimination". I don't see prejudice or antagonism here. But again, I don't think he is discriminating against white males. He already has interviewed most of them and I think it is totally okay to ask for others "based on their race" since they may have different views. So IMO, no discrimination, either.
In other words: Do you think it is racist to want to talk with group X about thing Y because you are interested in how X thinks about Y?
It really doesn't need to be that complicated. If you are excluding a group due to race, it is racist. Don't overthink it. He can interview whoever he wants, but when you come out and say "I'll interview everyone EXCEPT this one group of people" it is racist. He said the quiet part out loud.
reply