My vote is positive but low, in that after 15 years it should, and generally is common knowledge of the existence of Bitcoin - we are not finding large new naive communities that will embrace the orange life. But new people do get interested in economics and start to understand the system a little better, so it is positive. Places like El Salvador are setting education of public officials to be a political objective, which in turn will likely produce more orange pilled.

However, A pill implies the changing of a world view.

A baby today has always existed in a world of Bitcoin. By the time they are a teenager, they very likely will have always used Bitcoin, or their parents. Their parents may hold it in retirement accounts without ever realizing.

Orange Pilled being the norm, thus no radical change of perspective; it’s hard to say it’s a pilled state and not just a state from birth. So eventually, the first derivative will be negative, not because less people are using Bitcoin, but because default state will imply it; the eventual orange pill is non existent - and nonsensical, because why would it be any other way?