52 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 30 Aug
Their github has a lot more detail. It looks like it mostly exists to improve upon Signal and hide metadata. I wonder how it compares to SimpleX in practice. I don't know much about either but my understanding is that SimpleX has no single identity across chats, but maybe bootstrapping a chat leaks metadata?
https://m.stacker.news/49094
reply
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @AD_ 30 Aug
I’m not technical at all but the diagram reminds me of the lightning network, would that be a fair comparison?
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 30 Aug
Lightning is a digital (payments) communications protocol so it has a bit in common, but they don't have a whole lot in common otherwise.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @AD_ 30 Aug
I mean the way in which it routes a message from the sender through various servers to the recipient would be similar to the way payments find their way though nodes
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @JesseJames 30 Aug
yeah, that's called NOSTR (minus encryption)
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 30 Aug
This whole project is about encrypted comms.
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Malachi17 30 Aug
From DARPA? I somehow don't entirely trust this idea.
reply
10 sats \ 1 reply \ @DrStacker OP 30 Aug
The first code for the Tor network was developed in the mid-1990s by a team of researchers at the United States Naval Research Laboratory, including Roger Dingledine, Nick Mathewson, and Paul Syverson.
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @Malachi17 30 Aug
I am aware of the history of Tor. There are reasons to be cautious there too.
reply