pull down to refresh

The obstacle to a ceasefire is NATO mainly USA

The plan is to sacrifice Ukraine to weaken Russia

NATO doesn’t have the stomach for direct conflict vs Russia

The Kursk offensive is an interesting tactic. What is the objective? Gain Russian territory?

in my opinion, the kursk offensive serves the purpose of continuing to receive aid money from the partner states and thus keeping the bond market liquid. always keep an eye on Ukrainian government bonds as well

reply

I think it was more of a moral boost. The Eastern front is bad right now and throwing reinforcements at it wasn't going to help. By going into Kursk you embarrass Putin which is a huge win as well as gain a way to launch those crazy stupid drones that Ukraine has developed that is blowing up all those refineries and storage areas.

Kursk was interesting because it did really help out the Sumy region and recently Ukraine has begun pushing back in Kharkiv.

Moral boost was huge for the country though they needed a big win and they got one with Kursk

reply
1 sat \ 20 replies \ @Cje95 6 Sep 2024 -21 sats

I mean emboldening your enemies by letting them get what they want is a very stupid and we have plenty of evidence it is doesn't work.

Russia is already cooked and was cooked after a year and a half. Now its just well sad.

With regards to NATO and the US I will just drop this here...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0hZJwQlM_L0