pull down to refresh

221 sats \ 3 replies \ @7ac5aafdeb 6 Sep \ on: Bitkit Wallet AMA - John Carvalho, CEO of Synonym AMA
Why do you call Bitkit a wallet when it’s not? Isn’t 'wallet' merely a bad analogy? What happens when regulators ask you to treat Bitkit as what you call it?
write
preview
this territory is moderated
134 sats \ 2 replies \ @BitcoinErrorLog OP 6 Sep
Everything about Bitkit is trying to speak in "user terms." So "wallet" just makes sense for managing your money.
I know it is a keychain/keysigner. You know it is. We are both okay despite it being also a wallet.
Terms won't protect you from regulators.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @7ac5aafdeb 6 Sep
I don’t understand that. You also use the term ‘money’ to describe Bitcoin, and there are laws that apply to money. Since Bitcoin is not money, why would you promote it as such? Using the wrong words to describe something can cause serious problems in the future.
Why invite unwanted attention?
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @BitcoinErrorLog OP 6 Sep
This is my only unwanted attention at the moment.
reply