pull down to refresh
155 sats \ 6 replies \ @mo 7 Sep
is CPFP another way to refer to RBF or a totally different thing?
reply
199 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 7 Sep
both refer to the same result: get a tx confirmed when is stuck with a low fee. But yes are a bit different.
reply
131 sats \ 4 replies \ @ek 7 Sep
one is literally replacing your transaction (Replace By Fee) and the other is simply incentivizing miners to mine both of your transactions since the new one ("the child") (with a high fee) depends on the previous one ("the parent")
reply
206 sats \ 3 replies \ @DarthCoin OP 7 Sep
👍
Also never do a CPFP when you have a stuck opening LN channel. You will end up in a bad situation to recover your funds.
reply
122 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 7 Sep
Yes, I believe because the txid changes and you're paying into a multisig that the other party isn't necessarily aware about?
Also, with CPFP, you can accelerate transactions that you can't sign yourself unlike RBF. So if you're receiving an onchain tx, you can use CPFP to receive it faster by paying miners.
reply
47 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin OP 7 Sep
Exactly !
CPFP is nice when the sender do not have anymore funds to bump the fees, but the receiver is doing it from his side.
I did some tests in the past and I end up in that bad situation when by mistake I used CPFP instead of RBF for a channel bump. Is described in this guide
reply
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @ek 7 Sep
Damn, I know some stuff lol
reply
22 sats \ 0 replies \ @nostrman 7 Sep
Now I have my CPFP web application. Thanks a lot.
https://m.stacker.news/50434
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satoshi__Nakamoto 7 Sep
Video is great need to add more animations
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @note_bene 7 Sep
[mark norman voice]: child pays for parent?
more like social security payroll deduction, amiright?
reply