pull down to refresh
I'm wondering how's that gonna impact rewards for Stackers?
I'd guess it'd roughly be equivalent - this isn't intended to directly affect rewards.
We need to revisit and tune rewards though too.
Does it keep changing this way?
Yes. Everyday is a new competition with a variable "prize" pool.
You mean the percentage of reward changes for the same rank?
The amount of sats in the rewards pool changes dude.
I think it's actually a fair question since I was confused now, too.
We do have a fixed percentage per rank that we use for rewards. However, since a non-fixed percentage of your rewards go to referrers, your total percentage of rewards with the same rank change.
Does this make sense?
This definitely makes sense! 😃 Thanks for clarifying, I think I should ask you more when I get confused about SN since @k00b is a genius in creativity not in facts! ;)
I can see that but when the reward pool is allocated to 100 Stackers everyday, the percentage of reward should remain the same. How can percentage change?
Dude! The percentage also keeps changing. I don't how rewards work but for the same rank with the same reward pool you may recieve 2% and the very next day you may recieve, let's say, 2.2% of the total reward pool for the day.
If I understand correctly, that will reduce rewards by about 20% and zaps by about 10%, while increasing territory revenue by about 220%.
Are you including post/comment fees in that? I expected more like a 60% increase in territory revenue.
I was thinking 80% of 20% is replacing 50% of 10%. That would mean it's increasing from 5% to 16%.
I omitted the other fees entirely, so that probably explains the difference in our numbers.
Ah yeah, if we're talking strictly zap revenue, I see what you see.
Maybe we already discussed this idea, then I just rediscovered it: when territories have their own reward pools, founders could configure how much of fees go to them as revenue and how much go to rewards.
Yep, that's still planned.
Still worth it.
Decoding you is hard. 🧐
🥴
Is it still worth it at 30%?
Probably not. But increasing this percentage makes it easier for the territory owner to be a sybil, no?
If paired with the wrong revenue split, it would.
70/30 might be a better mix.
100 sat zap: 70 sats to content, 21 to founder, 2 to (potential) outbound route fees, 7 guaranteed for sybil fee.
I've been thinking about increasing territory fee split to 80% of fee revenue and the zap sybil fee to 20%.