pull down to refresh
248 sats \ 23 replies \ @k00b 9 Sep 2024 \ on: Stacker Saloon
I've been thinking about increasing territory fee split to 80% of fee revenue and the zap sybil fee to 20%.
If I understand correctly, that will reduce rewards by about 20% and zaps by about 10%, while increasing territory revenue by about 220%.
reply
Are you including post/comment fees in that? I expected more like a 60% increase in territory revenue.
reply
I was thinking 80% of 20% is replacing 50% of 10%. That would mean it's increasing from 5% to 16%.
I omitted the other fees entirely, so that probably explains the difference in our numbers.
reply
Ah yeah, if we're talking strictly zap revenue, I see what you see.
reply
Maybe we already discussed this idea, then I just rediscovered it: when territories have their own reward pools, founders could configure how much of fees go to them as revenue and how much go to rewards.
reply
Yep, that's still planned.
reply
I'm wondering how's that gonna impact rewards for Stackers?
reply
I'd guess it'd roughly be equivalent - this isn't intended to directly affect rewards.
We need to revisit and tune rewards though too.
reply
reply
Does it keep changing this way?
Yes. Everyday is a new competition with a variable "prize" pool.
reply
You mean the percentage of reward changes for the same rank?
reply
The amount of sats in the rewards pool changes dude.
70/30 might be a better mix.
100 sat zap: 70 sats to content, 21 to founder, 2 to (potential) outbound route fees, 7 guaranteed for sybil fee.
reply
Still worth it.
reply
Decoding you is hard. 🧐
reply
🥴
reply
Is it still worth it at 30%?
reply
Probably not. But increasing this percentage makes it easier for the territory owner to be a sybil, no?
reply
If paired with the wrong revenue split, it would.