reply on: Stacker Saloon \ stacker news

248 sats \ 23 replies \ @k00b 9 Sep \ on: Stacker Saloon

I've been thinking about increasing territory fee split to 80% of fee revenue and the zap sybil fee to 20%.

10 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined 9 Sep

If I understand correctly, that will reduce rewards by about 20% and zaps by about 10%, while increasing territory revenue by about 220%.

28 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 9 Sep

Are you including post/comment fees in that? I expected more like a 60% increase in territory revenue.

140 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined 9 Sep

I was thinking 80% of 20% is replacing 50% of 10%. That would mean it's increasing from 5% to 16%.

I omitted the other fees entirely, so that probably explains the difference in our numbers.

25 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 9 Sep

Ah yeah, if we're talking strictly zap revenue, I see what you see.

9 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 9 Sep

Maybe we already discussed this idea, then I just rediscovered it: when territories have their own reward pools, founders could configure how much of fees go to them as revenue and how much go to rewards.

18 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 9 Sep

Yep, that's still planned.

31 sats \ 9 replies \ @Coinsreporter 9 Sep

I'm wondering how's that gonna impact rewards for Stackers?

20 sats \ 8 replies \ @k00b 9 Sep

I'd guess it'd roughly be equivalent - this isn't intended to directly affect rewards.

We need to revisit and tune rewards though too.

42 sats \ 7 replies \ @Coinsreporter 9 Sep

equivalent as it's now?

I see my today's reward was way too less than it's been on most other days. The percentage share has changed too much as I can I see.

Today

Yesterday

Does it keep changing this way?

20 sats \ 6 replies \ @k00b 9 Sep

Does it keep changing this way?

Yes. Everyday is a new competition with a variable "prize" pool.

31 sats \ 5 replies \ @Coinsreporter 9 Sep

You mean the percentage of reward changes for the same rank?

116 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b 9 Sep

The amount of sats in the rewards pool changes dude.

100 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 9 Sep

I think it's actually a fair question since I was confused now, too.

We do have a fixed percentage per rank that we use for rewards. However, since a non-fixed percentage of your rewards go to referrers, your total percentage of rewards with the same rank change.

Does this make sense?

86 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 9 Sep

This definitely makes sense! 😃 Thanks for clarifying, I think I should ask you more when I get confused about SN since @k00b is a genius in creativity not in facts! ;)

reply on another page

31 sats \ 1 reply \ @Coinsreporter 9 Sep

I can see that but when the reward pool is allocated to 100 Stackers everyday, the percentage of reward should remain the same. How can percentage change?

120 sats \ 0 replies \ @IamSINGLE 9 Sep

Dude! The percentage also keeps changing. I don't how rewards work but for the same rank with the same reward pool you may recieve 2% and the very next day you may recieve, let's say, 2.2% of the total reward pool for the day.

reply on another page

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 10 Sep

70/30 might be a better mix.

100 sat zap: 70 sats to content, 21 to founder, 2 to (potential) outbound route fees, 7 guaranteed for sybil fee.

0 sats \ 5 replies \ @random_ 9 Sep

Still worth it.

21 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b 9 Sep

Decoding you is hard. 🧐

0 sats \ 3 replies \ @random_ 9 Sep

🥴

0 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b 9 Sep

Is it still worth it at 30%?

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @random_ 9 Sep

Probably not. But increasing this percentage makes it easier for the territory owner to be a sybil, no?

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 9 Sep

If paired with the wrong revenue split, it would.