Item number one: Bitcoin does not need scaling but the reasoning that he made is not something that you juxtapose into the premise.

Item Number Two: It is always dismissible in terms of using the word consensus. But we cannot apply it to people who have their opinions. The reasoning of people who want self-custody is to develop a way to avoid at all cost asset freezing or seizures.

Item Number Three: As I have already mentioned the premise is not to be juxtaposed with his narrative regarding self custody. It is just obvious that he hates self custody and he does not want the idea to spread. This is his ploy. There is consensus but you cannot force the self custody group to abdicate their position simply because someone is having a learning plateau issue with regards to self custody.