reply on: Why not change this territory name to cryptography? \ stacker news ~crypto

131 sats \ 7 replies \ @ek 19h \ on: Why not change this territory name to cryptography? crypto

There was a lot of discussion about this in the pinned post (and in the linked post), here's one example thread where I explained my decision: #364665

Also, if I don't use crypto as a territory here for cryptography, I don't want to see someone else claim that name for shitcoins exclusively. Shitcoins will die, but crypto will prevail.

I don't care either way, but what is the intent of this territory?

Doesn't the title of the pinned post make that clear?

142 sats \ 2 replies \ @DesertDave OP 19h

Thanks. I didn't look very closely before posting this. Is it working? Apparently, I believe in the idea. #507208 hahaha

110 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 19h

I don't think it's working right now but I have a low time preference

Apparently, I believe in the idea. #507208 hahaha

haha lol

27 sats \ 0 replies \ @DesertDave OP 19h

It makes sense to me now. I didn't really think it through before posting the question. I reacted based on the tension I experienced in this post. #696538

33 sats \ 0 replies \ @DesertDave OP 19h

That makes a lot a sense. It's taking the word back. I get it.

311 sats \ 1 reply \ @Turdinthepunchbowl 17h

I've almost considered creating a shitcoin territory, only to post hilariously dumb crypto things in a mocking way for entertainment purposes. Like a guy on reddit trading a full BTC for Cronos, the shitty Crypto.com token and claiming it was a good trade despite him down probably $15k in USD terms. Probably worth the cautionary tales haha.

0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DesertDave OP 17h

That's an interesting idea. I am sure it is sometimes helpful for people to hear the cautionary tales.

64 sats \ 0 replies \ @Coinsreporter 16h

It's good. It's a trap for shitcoiners.