I am having a difficult time to get my students to remember the baseline rules of Subject-verb agreement. Note that I didn’t write finer rules. They can’t even tell me the 7 personal pronouns in the English language, let alone answer confidently about which pronoun needs to be paired with verbs that take the “-s” suffix.
To level up their knowledge, I had them draw this flow chart in class. I want them to be able to imagine them in their mind’s eye (i.e. form clear mental representations).
But of course, as their teacher, I ought to provide exemplary service by giving them a flowchart. Yes, students learn better when they design their own flowchart. And I believe there’s a need for teachers to spoonfeed students knowledge so that they can proceed to the application stage faster.
I researched and found out about Mindgen. It’s an AI tool that creates mind maps.
I expected it to generate a mind map based on my prompt, but it turned out that I needed to input a link. So, I searched around and inserted the URL of an article that explained the SVA rules.
Instantly, it was hard at work churning out the mind map.
The quality and clarity of the mind map exceeded my expectations, but I don’t think my students would be able to harness it. I guess if I want to make customised material that is tailored to my students’ needs, I shouldn’t be taking short cuts.
Nonetheless, I think Mindgen is a good tool to use if you have articles that appeal to you but don’t intrigue you enough to make time out for reading.
I dont know if l believe in mind maps. I feel good old fashion repetition works better in some cases.
reply
I think they have different uses.
Repetition is how to develop immediate instinctive habits, which is needed to speak fluently.
Mind maps can help someone determine what is correct. It's slower and more deliberate, so not great for tasks that are done regularly.
reply
The problem is that students dont want to develop these kind of habits. At least my students didnt.
reply
It's nearly impossible to teach someone who doesn't want to learn.
reply
haha You should have seen their parents. Even worse.
reply
No surprise there. My dad was a teacher, so I'm pretty well-versed in that world.
reply
One of my classes, their spelling was very bad. So in order to leave the classroom, I made them write down each word 5 times There were like 10 words. They all did it, then cried to their parents. I was told I couldnt do it again.
reply
I forced my students to copy Switch on 100 times the other day because I was so sick n tired of hearing them shout Off the fan
That doesn't seem like an unreasonable assignment. Times have changed.
I think both have their place in education. Since I’m preparing the kiddos for their exams, I want them to dig out this mental representation from their cognitive drawers n apply it. Let’s see how it goes
reply
Interesting!
I share the thought that mind-maps are more about learning than sharing information. I was a fan for years of mind-maps, used them for real and complex tasks at work. My predilect tool has always been FreePlane. It's fully featured and all-powerful, I was never able to find its end or something it could not do. However, with time I settled with plain markdown in obsidian and never looked back again.
reply
Yes. Freeplane is really good. Simple example above might have clickable links on Merriam-Webster for instance.
reply
Will give Freeplane a go then!
reply
Remember: it's fully featured. You can set up reminders, progress bars, and (extremely useful) filters. It's a furious organizer-machine. But, the one thing that made me ditch it was that I realized I worked most of the time with long text form, for which freeplane resulted increasingly unwieldy, the reason I went for markdown/obsidian.
reply
Thanks to Obsidian, I have been typing up extracts of phrases I like from books to see if there are any insights I particularly gravitate towards. Would you know how to use Obsidian as a second brain? I imagined links flying from one book to another to yet another, but I don’t know how to activate it
reply
After using freeplane almost "professionally" for years, I realized I didn't use inter-links as often, and just inline-written referrals wherever needed. But with time I realized that whenever I needed more than just an inter-link reminder, I actually needed to reorganize text.
I found out I was fully covered with plain text outlines and two fundamental navigation tools: the file search bar at the left (big picture), and the table of contents bar at the right (local picture). It allows me to see much more information and connections in a much more compact space.
The "connection-like" effect is caused thus as follows:
  • At the left you have the tree structure of all files
  • At the right you have the tree structure of the document
  • At the center, by outlining, you have the tree structure of the local ideas.
That makes it a breeze to navigate everything at every scale, so I don't even use the "connections graph" obsidian is so famed for.
In contrast to this, mind-maps are exactly like looking for things in google maps: you have to zoom in and out and essentially "physically" walk through the document, for everything is visual. It's super cool for small, local diagrams (which is what markdown correctly reduces graphs to), but not for big-scale file/document structure. A mind-map is actually the exact opposite of markdown: it's graph-first, with auxiliary local texts, while markdown is text-first, with auxiliary local graphs.
reply
reply
Omg yes, I taught my form class the memory palace this year
reply