SN (tiny) release: refined trust and rewards
2909 sats \ 20 comments \ @k00b 14 Sep 2022 meta
From now on, rewards will now display where you got rewards from:
  1. top posts
  2. top comments
  3. or upvoting top posts/comments
There's some other stuff we do with rewards now that isn't exposed yet, like what rank your post/comments/upvoting was relative to everyone else that day. We're storing it to be able to give people trophies in the future.
I reworked trust some. Nothing major there - just some simplifications to the query to generate the trust graph and a bit more strictness on what suggests trustworthy behavior.
write
preview
related posts
761 sats \ 0 replies \ @rijndael 15 Sep 2022
you dropped this: đź‘‘
reply
357 sats \ 2 replies \ @beorange 15 Sep 2022
Small suggestion: It would be cool if we could bookmark/star/favorite a discussion/comment, this way it would be easier to come back later and read it again or check the new content, since after a few days it might be hard to find or remember that particular discussion.
reply
142 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b OP 15 Sep 2022
Soon™️ https://github.com/stackernews/stacker.news/issues/71
reply
214 sats \ 0 replies \ @derekross 15 Sep 2022
Bookmarks would be epic. Thank you.
reply
358 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b OP 15 Sep 2022
Going to end the week with some ~jobs improvements, and then going to think through muting/downvoting and figure out what works best.
reply
101 sats \ 1 reply \ @ThrillerX_ 15 Sep 2022
muting, downvoting just looks messy
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @DeezSats 16 Sep 2022
Can we substract sats when we downvote?
reply
331 sats \ 0 replies \ @kr 14 Sep 2022
🏆
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @satup 15 Sep 2022
so beautiful, please do have a downvote(1sat) function as income source to SN
reply
43 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 15 Sep 2022
We are brainstorming penalties and content minimization right now. I’ll probably post a thread asking for feedback on a few ideas.
reply
33 sats \ 0 replies \ @ThrillerX_ 15 Sep 2022
Learn more: #8349
reply
33 sats \ 3 replies \ @HODL 15 Sep 2022
Great job @k00b!
A bit unrelated question. Is there a chance to limit a post duplicity? I just came across a couple of posts linking to the same Bitcoin Mag article (Mining Concentration In America Poses A Major Threat To Bitcoin).
It's obviously OK for now but it could become really messy in the future ...food for thought.
reply
44 sats \ 2 replies \ @k00b OP 15 Sep 2022
Yes, I need to do that. Right now we tell users about duplicate links but don’t otherwise discourage it.
We also need to tell people when other users have posted the same story from different sources
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @HODL 15 Sep 2022
Perhaps some automod could move the dups into a special category straight after it's posted. Doing that manually (like is the case of different sources) will for sure become difficult.
reply
44 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b OP 15 Sep 2022
The one thing we are pretty firmly not going to explore is centralized moderation. We need to do better.
That said, we don’t know exactly how we’ll approach this yet.
Whoops wrong thread.
I think the move is to make the same link expensive to post shortly after another one.
Similar stories are harder but simply letting users know a similar story exists might deter them.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @go 16 Sep 2022
That. Is. Great.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Satoshonalro 15 Sep 2022
champion 🏆
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @Wil 15 Sep 2022
Love it! keep up the good work
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ken 15 Sep 2022
đź‘Ź
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @TheWildHustle 15 Sep 2022
Nice
reply