I don't think that's what the author's saying. That part is about the individual states being in debt and potentially needing to be bailed out by the federal government. I don't know if it's true that CA has half a trillion dollars in state debt obligations, but that's the claim.
Ok thanks: he's talking about the internal or state liabilities, that are separate from the federal debt. In that sense, the debt load is only ½ of CA GDP (federal liabilities load is 128% of the US GDP). So I don't see why it's that significant?
reply
I didn't really understand that whole part of the analysis, since the event being described is highly inflationary, which should make repaying debts easier rather than more difficult. Perhaps I missed something, though.
reply