It was recently announced that the Nobel Prize in Chemistry was shared between Demis Hassabis-John Jumper and David Bake. The latter, according to the newspaper El País, and I quote: "has learned to master the so-called building blocks of life - the 20 amino acids - and to create completely new proteins that did not exist in nature. He achieved this for the first time in 2003..."

This statement has made me think of what some have called the emergence of life through EVOLUTION. And the term Evolution draws my attention because it leaves the development of complex elements with defined particularities to "chance", such as the specific case of natural proteins formed by EXCLUSIVELY LEFT-HANDED amino acids. If chance were the origin of life, would it not be more logical to expect a 50% distribution of amino acids in natural proteins? In addition, in terms of probability we should take into account the following data:

Proteins result from the union of amino acids (from fifty to several thousand) in a highly specific order. The average functional protein in a “simple” cell contains 200 amino acids, and there are thousands of different types of proteins even in this kind of cell. The probability that a protein of only 100 amino acids would ever form randomly on Earth would be about one in a quadrillion (10^15)

An experiment conducted in 1953 leads many scientists to believe that life originated spontaneously. Chemist Stanley L. Miller obtained amino acids (the building blocks of proteins) by sending electrical discharges into a mixture of gases that simulated the early Earth atmosphere.

If the mixture of gases represented the early atmosphere and the electrical discharges the discharges that gave rise to the amino acids, WHO DOES MILLER REPRESENT? Chance or an intelligent being?