pull down to refresh

0 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek OP 20 Sep 2022 \ parent \ on: Why did Saylor say "proprietary software" in his article? bitcoin
So you agree it's confusing? I wonder if someone already mentioned it to him. I think he should correct it.
But still, even replacing "proprietary" with "non-proprietary" doesn't make sense. He stills says
That places all security & control of the network in the hands of a small group of software developers, who must create virtual machines doing virtual work with virtual energy in a virtual world to create virtual security.
afterwards and is (clearly?) talking about Ethereum before (and after, as the quote about "virtual machines ..." shows.
So SHA-256 ASICs also doesn't make sense to me.
I can see what he's getting at. But I am not sure everyone else is when reading this
write
preview
5 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 20 Sep 2022
It's definitely confusing.
reply